Our website is made possible by displaying non-intrusive online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling or pausing your ad blocker.
you say that there is a UFO just cause you think what you saw is a UFO. but you don't have proof that it's a UFO. the burden of proof is on you to show that what you saw is really a UFO. at the end of the day what we can conclude is that the company has non current assets of receivables and high receivables that's all. you can make any decision based on that but don't go around claiming that there is a scam going on when you cannot prove it.
I'm sorry but I'm too stupid to understand the reasoning, can someone explain? increasing receivables and receivables in non current asset = scam just because previous scandals look alike? Since there are claims that it is cooking the book can someone provide evidence?