All Comments on FOCUS Reload

Login to comment.
Julius Tan
65 Like · Reply
今天假突破带量下杀,看来庄家出票出得很顺利。一个反弹就可以引那么多鱼游过来了,只能说这个庄家实在懂得如何让散户买进,呵呵~
chin lua
No response from the one-line-attacked old fool? From now on, I have a standard response just for the mindless zombies:

On Sept 26, 117,723,000 Focus mothers have been snapped instantly. So, my first prediction of 100% profit had been fulfilled. Who are you to question my investment in 0.5¢ Focus shares? Have you ever achieved a 100% blue-chip profit in a single jump of price point? If not, shut up, you loser, hahaha:)
Show more
Like · 1 day · translate
chin lua
The zombies attacked my posts about buying the 0.5¢ mothers "before" Sept 26. So, zombies are the witnesses to my first 100% gain, hehe:)
Like · 1 day · translate
chin lua
1 Like · Reply
Google AI:
"The company maintains an impressive trailing twelve months (TTM) gross margin of 56.40% as of 2025. This indicates strong pricing power or efficient direct cost management within its food and beverage (F&B) and lifestyle operations. Focus Dynamics operates with a relatively conservative total debt-to-equity ratio of 17.38%. The Arch galleries project—a large-scale urban entertainment and F&B hub—is a key pillar of their portfolio."

AI is still able to outsmart "@郭猪聞," hahaha:)
Show more
chin lua
Sorry, I cannot give you my 0.5¢ mothers or daughters, hahaha:) Do not be jealous of someone who planned the 0.5¢ shares at least four years ago. The HK shark cheated, despite my numerous warnings, your 87¢ Focus mothers, not me, OK?
Like · 6 days · translate
chin lua
Are you too late to give any warning? I had been shouting about high risks and sharks 4-5 years ago, but no one listened. The fact that you are mentioning "high risks" now means you did not pay any attention to this "shark" stock, so shut the f**k up:)
Show more
1 Like · 6 days · translate
郭曙聞
Like · Reply
good ? no use company
chin lua
2 Like · Reply
If I sold my 0.5¢ mothers for 1¢ (100% return), I forsook a potential 87¢ (17,400% return), especially after the clear evidence of share amassing by the original big shark:)
chin lua
The HK shark did a good job of scaring all retail investors away so that I had many chances to amass the 0.5¢ shares—thanks a lot, man, haha:) But, the shark definitely has cost more than 0.5¢ as the manipulations, saddled by some higher prices, were not cheap! So, the smart way is to buy the 0.5¢ ones, no matter what, hehe:)
Show more
1 Like · 1 week · translate
chin lua
This is another victory lap against the zombies, hahaha:) And where are Julius Tan and his die-hard, brain-dead fan—"old goreng hand"?
1 Like · 1 week · translate
chin lua
1 Like · Reply
No one is interested in Focus Dynamics? Read today's announcement about how the HK shark has secretly amassed mothers up to 965,143,526 shares (15.146%) via the Morgan Stanley proxy! But rest assured he could not get the cheapest 0.5¢ mothers, unlike me, haha:)
Show more
chin lua
I said, at least four years ago, that he would amass the shares again—another prediction that has been fulfilled!
Six other related shark stocks (JSB, TRIVE, AEM, CHEETAH, PINEAPP, NETX) were amassed by the shark as well:
https://www.klsescreener.com/v2/news/view/1639887
Show more
1 Like · 1 week · translate
郭曙聞
Like · Reply
good price 5cent
chin lua
Like · Reply
When I read this enanyang news, I could not believe the reporter's naiveness! The Edge Malaysia already reported that a large number of 0.5¢ mothers were dumped by a margin account of Morgan Stanley. A big Western investment bank is not interested in our blue chips—too small, let alone micro-cap ACE stocks! This Morgan Stanley account is manipulated by the sharks—previously, it was Credit Suisse!
Show more
chin lua
"截至昨日(4日)闭市,富科斯收1仙;Netx控股报4仙;捷豹挂10仙,都是价格非常低的“仙股”,根本无法对投资组合创造价值,摩根史丹利的“退出”完全合理。摩根史丹利的撤出,并不是第一家、也不会是最后一家。外资并没有全面看淡大马,但很明显正在重新排列优先顺序。资金更愿意停在流动性好、估值较稳、增长更确定的领域,例如银行、科技大型股以及出口导向企业;至于消费和中小型公司,必须拿出更强的盈利能力,才能重新吸引注意。"
https://www.enanyang.my/news/20251205/Finance/1092440
Show more
Like · 3 weeks · translate
chin lua
The HK shark is in a much stronger financial position, as evidenced by buying two KLSE-listed companies via his registered British Virgin Islands entity—VCAP Global Inc. Hence, it will be unlikely to have another margin call for dumping the 0.5¢ mothers!
Show more
Like · 3 weeks · translate
chin lua
1 Like · Reply
What the heck, Morgan Stanley bought back the same 129,018,326 shares on Dec 2, after dumping them on Dec 1!
chin lua
However, the HK shark is still very tricky in concealing the rest of the transactions. The Lambo sharks' Focus mothers before Dec 1 are 365,249,326 shares (5.732%). When 129,018,326 shares were transferred on Dec 1, the Lambo sharks were no longer the substantial owner (<5%), and hence the transferring of the remaining shares (365,249,326 - 129,018,326) needed no notice! If so, why the secrecy? The new owner, via Morgan Stanley, has the same 365,249,326 shares (5.732%) on Dec 2!
Show more
Like · 3 weeks · translate
chin lua
Regardless, the HK shark was unlikely to get the 0.5¢ mothers. So, my 0.5¢ mothers not only beat the Lambo sharks (average cost at least 8¢), but also the HK shark, haha:) My dancing-with-the-shark strategy works better as I need not "goreng" anything!
Show more
Like · 3 weeks · translate
chin lua
Like · Reply
Damn, Morgan Stanley (proxy for Lambo sharks) was disposing of 129,018,326 shares not via the open market—no hope for additional 0.5¢ mothers!
chin lua
The XOX (or HK) shark had most likely negotiated a deal for Morgan Stanley's disposing shares of NetX, Cheetah, and Focus!
Like · 3 weeks · translate
chin lua
Apparently, not all sharks could get the 0.5¢ mothers:) Lambo sharks' cheapest Focus mothers, if I recall correctly, were about 4¢! So, the cash-strapped (Lambo, with RM7.7M market cap.) sharks are the big losers, haha:)
Like · 3 weeks · translate
chin lua
1 Like · Reply
No one (except me) gave any warning about Focus Dynamics being dominated by the sharks 4-5 years ago with prices ranging from 60¢ to 70¢! The "smart" critics voiced after-the-fact and useless comments after Focus fell from the height of 87¢ to 0.5¢. The funny thing is that all their glorious comments on other glorious stocks are not safer than Focus's 0.5¢ over the past five years—just open their recommended stock names if you do not trust me:) To be helpful, you make predictions, not BS, OK?
Show more
chin lua
That is, when you criticize me, show me your PREDICTIONS; otherwise, f**k off, hahaha:) Being the 0.5¢ owner, I am in the safest position, hehe:) They are better than 4-ekor numbers because the bet money is not forfeited if the stock does not appreciate on any trading day!!! Also, no point in insulting me as my predictions are fulfilling (like the 0.5¢ ones), and the first 100% return (first minimum appreciation, not my target) has already been "fulfilled"!
Show more
Like · 1 month · translate