Our website is made possible by displaying non-intrusive online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling or pausing your ad blocker.
Hello, that is your decision, and you are not a kid! According to the linguistic relativity hypothesis, your language dictates your thoughts and reasoning. So, use the logical English to analyze Focus, not your bullshits. Your avoidance of the details means you are not familiar with Focus at all! In my research group, a project's success also depends on the honest, constructive and logical reasons for opposing the project, not just say "no, no, no, ..." like a baby!
E.g. I gave objective facts about the gross-profit percentages for at least 16 conservative periods -- what is so bad about that fact? You do not have to believe, just check the reports -- and even after that, it is your decision, not anyone else! I reported TRX facts and their effects on The Arch's prospect -- which part is not true? The words "old 'goreng' hand" mean you had lost a shirt, according to Warrent Buffett and centuries of academic studies!
Here is another "hateful" accounting fact for zombies. I checked 2019, the gross-profit percentages are all over 50%. So, now at least 20 "consecutive" of about 50% "operating earnings" (preferred by Warrent Buffett), which is a clear trend of a successful business model. A hint -- including more "big words" and due diligence in facts finding will make your reasoning more credible -- i.e. I had to open up 20 quarter reports, unlike zombies with cheap words:-)
Old hand is obviously new here. Old readers knew that I was educated in the west, and I do not give a damn about your Chinese ethics -- if you insult me, I will insult you back -- as simple as that! Your obvious and hostile first statements insulted me for no reason despite your more-polite excuses now! If you said "I politely disagree with you," then I would "politely say you are entitled to your opinion." I do not treat a cyber bully with respect, and it is not about money or even PA!
Besides, you are bullshitting again to cover the very fact that you are absolutely ignorant about Focus -- the main and only topic here! Starting from my recent comments about the consecutive gross profits, TRX and The Arch -- which part is incorrect or misleading? You attacked an issue you had no knowledge at all! Do you even know what "The Arch" is?
If you are not interested in PA, why are you here? If you wanted to warn the readers about Focus's sharks and manipulations, I had already given them aplenty in detail based on facts and logical analyses! Yet, some of them chose PA -- what can you do?
I am practicing "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth"! Before you give your precious opinions and recommendations, can you tell me the earliest source of the practice? A hint -- you need to brush up your Google-Search skills and ascertain which material is more reliable!
You see, Zombie Cain is so jealous about my money again, hahaha:-) Same thing: do you know what biblical Cain is all about? I bullshit when bullshit Cain appears:-) But, what else can you discuss when two zombies do not know how to use the Internet intelligently in finding out facts, especially about Focus!
From the Chinese sentences, old hand is definitely better than Zombie Cain, but both cyber bullies are not here to provide any useful analysis or fact about Focus -- why? Because they simply cannot, hahaha:-) They do not even bother to open up a quarter report to rebuke my accounting analyses!
Sorry to pressure these two zombies -- Chinese is not the original or logical language of maths (including accounting) and sciences, which was why Dr. M proposed English as the teaching medium. And the Chinese Internet is not the reliable source of true knowledge and facts! The readers here can learn a thing or two from my "insults," hehe:-)
See, old hand is bullshitting again, hahaha! He said my accounting analyses are "bullshits" without giving any evidence or analytical rebuttal -- why? Because he simply knows no accounting! Sorry old hand, but you have "no hand" to recommend a stock or go against Focus if you know no English! The readers here can study his rebuttals in detail -- do you want your kids to debate with others professionally just like him?
E.g. there is a net loss of RM12.86M for 2023 Q3. So, why is old hand not using the big loss to shame me? Because he knows no accounting or does not bother to read or study, hahaha:-)
"Learning English for Finance and Accounting can help learners gain a better understanding of financial concepts and terminology. Many financial terms and expressions are specific to English, and mastering these can help learners understand financial news and reports from English-speaking countries."
The readers here can learn a thing or two from my "insults," but pure hatred from old hand:-) Stay tuned for more zero-IQ or zero-knowledge hateful remarks from him, hehe:-)
I gave old hand an opportunity to shame me by challenging him to search the pharse "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth," but he let go of it -- why? Because he does not even know how to use Google Search to obtain any credible information from a trustworthy source!
"Talion, principle developed in early Babylonian law and present in both biblical and early Roman law that criminals should receive as punishment precisely those injuries and damages they had inflicted upon their victims. Many early societies applied this 'eye-for-an-eye' principle literally." https://www.britannica.com/topic/talion
This kahwei is as dumb as old hand -- again, just Googling "anything" with a credible source, and why! If you do not know how to search a fact for a counter, then your words or opinions are like an empty can -- got sounds but no content, hahaha:-)
All these zombies (Zombie Cain, kahwei, old hand & others) have some things in common: broken written Chinese, low-IQ content, senseless insults, go banana against PA buyers, etc. It makes me wonder if they are of the same group working for the same Focus's Taiko as loan sharks, hahaha:) Well, to save you zombies the trouble, a few of us (readers here not our concerns) are going to buy PA all the way -- even after 30-to-1, and these loan sharks have no way to stop us, hehe:)
Hello, all zombies or loan sharks, is this your work, too? Do not be shy as I would not report your names (Zombie Cain, kahwei, old hand & others) to the cops, hahaha:)
Zombie Cain is showing off his broken written Chinese, again, hahaha:) But, his level, and so far all the gang members, is below year 5 (or Grade 5) Chinese!
sorry chin Lua at least I don't criticize Chinese and speak broken English like you do. anyway your English is so awful that ppl could barely understand. I think you should spend your time to improve your English instead of using Google translate
You are not new, and should know (mentioned in my old posts) I had academic papers published on the professional journals about AI (yes, many years ago) driving a swarm of autonomous vehicles (popular now). Also, my BBA, MS & PhD (GPA 4.0/4.0) were all from the US universities. These zombies made false claims about reading my old comments, but clearly it is not about any stock but cyberbullying! Google Translate or not, your exposed written Chinese is clearly below a fifth grader, hahaha:)
Google Translate is like a new world for the brainless zombies, but our research group had already studied the AI behind Google Translate, and deemed it not suitable for our autonomous vehicles!
Your comments of course are shit, but some of mine have predictive power. For example, I mentioned the first non-deadly Omicron (in this thread, many months ago) is like a cold because most virus particles stay in the throat, and the recent statistics prove that!
The board of OpenAI (maker of ChatGPT) fired its CEO because Q-Star (a secret project) is dangerous as it thinks like humans. However, in my published papers or research group, I argued that AI cannot think like a human brain -- why? As such, I was against using Google's self-driving AI for my autonomous vehicles. I was right as Google has abandoned its self-driving car project!
Roger Penrose, a Nobel laureate for his quantum theoretical contribution, had argued that a Turing machine (aka computer), based on formal logic, is not comparable to the human mind that can process "Godel sentences" -- hence, Q-Star has no human intelligence!
ChatGPT, based on neural network architecture (again, not new), amazes many people who are not familiar with any AI research. The faster chips made by TSMC coupled with its 2.5D CoWos packaging have made the neural network deeper with more precise network weights from much faster self-learning or self-trading algorithms. But, the self-learning material must come from the top-quality or professional batch; otherwise, the translation will look like the sample provided by Cc, hahaha!
Q-Star, based on formal logic, is "smarter" than the copy-and-paste ChatGPT. However, Q-Star's mathematical symbols are still not human intelligence. Hence, the OpenAI board was ignorant when firing the CEO. One can compare Q-Star to Prolog -- a logic-based programming language.
My friend said I wrote too deeply about the unrelated issues. But, look at old hand's one, more of the same boring cyberbullying, hahaha:) At least he definitely cannot write about professional AI issues, hehe:) Ask him to explain human consciousness in terms of quantum mechanics!
There are many Malays who graduated with a degree that cannot be proven academically. How do you do the hiring without the worthless degree? You can ask all applicants to write about 100 words of any bullshit issue, and you hire the ones who can explain the issue "deeply" with proper citations. Surely, old hand's writing is not qualified for any professional job, hahaha:)
Wow, old face's skin is much thicker than his old hand, hahaha:) A word of advice for those not interested in PA. Malaysia accounting belongs to the English professional world. Every single listed KLSE company publishes its quarterly or annually financial results in English, and are certified by the public auditors who passed the UK's ACCA examinations. For picking other stocks, you certainly want to listen to your auditor friends than old hand:)
We are still waiting for the zombies to explain our very "soul" thing -- the relationship between our consciousness and quantum mechanics. We should give the zombies a chance to prove themselves that they have some degree of intellectual abilities:)
The staff had watched too many Terminator movies, and were not capable of examining Godel's (a titan in his field) proof that AI (limited by formal logic) is no human! The theoretical big issues and limits (except one, not AI) had been solved before a single computer was invented! Altman plus three of his loyalists have returned to the board.
All chips are simply an adder (1+1=2, proven) -- a multiplier is a short-cut of an adder. As such, they all fall under Godel's proof. At the heart of a computer, it is preordain not to excel in human intelligence!
"The main reason that it takes so long to get to 1+1=2 is that Principia Mathematica starts from almost nothing, and works its way up in very tiny, incremental steps. The work of G. Peano shows that it's not hard to produce a useful set of axioms that can prove 1+1=2 much more easily than Whitehead and Russell do." https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/278974/prove-that-11-2/278983#278983
Why the scholarly AI "bullshit" were written here? Because Cc claimed that I know no English and certainly could not be the author of the mentioned papers, hahaha:) You need no English as your translations will reveal the extent of my AI knowledge. Perhaps none of your Chinese-speaking friends can comprehend the content as we were at the frontier of AI research! Perhaps next time I could tell what happened to my swarms of autonomous vehicles. Do Ukraine's unmanned surface drones have my AI?
Focus-WD (not PA), which cannot be converted (upon expiry) to mothers automatically, have long been advised not to buy! The warrants still have 19 months, not 12 months (one year). We also do not worry about mothers as they never get to 0.5¢. Even if they do, the sharks could dilute your ownership by rights-issue exercise.
"Ant International, a digital payment and financial technology provider affiliated with Ant Group, has announced that it will establish a new Digital Business Centre in Malaysia. The Digital Business Centre will be located at Exchange 106 in Tun Razak Exchange (TRX). Ant International is expected to move in by 2025 and it will create more than 500 new job opportunities in the first year with more hirings in the subsequent years until 2028."
"According to well-placed sources, the regulator kicked off the investigations following complaints and tip-offs from the public on alleged fraud, as well as potential false or misleading disclosure by several public-listed companies in their fund-raising exercises, including private placements, employees share option schemes and rights issues. It is learnt that the raids were conducted around the Tropicana area in Petaling Jaya."
Very wicked as the gross-profit percentage is 60% for 2024 Q1 -- "21" quarters of at least 50% "consecutively or repeatedly" since 2019! That is, not a single loss quarter during those years -- either it is an incredible golden goose or accounting fraud, which is very unlikely for reporting the similar high percentages! I have been accruing the vast majority of the PA since March 20, and Zombies here could not stop me, haha:)
Right now, no one (except my friend) is competing for the 0.5¢ PA as all have been giving up hope, but a golden opportunity for me and my friend, whose 500,000 buy units are still not yet fulfilled, hehe:)
The "Other Operating Expenses" is RM15.7M, yet no new brands or outlets were launched -- meaning the money was mostly spent on The Arch, whose construction cost was completely spent, leaving only about RM10M for the renovation.
Just like the trends for the past 22 quarters, both revenues and gross margin percentages (61.4% for 2024 Q2) are similar or stable -- like it or not, zombies, haha:) No need to convince anyone here as my friend and I were basically the "sole buyers" of 0.5¢ PA since the end of last year until a few weeks ago when large 0.5¢ dumpings had stopped!
It took around 1.5 years to drop to 0.5¢, yet we cannot achieve our targeted proportions of PA despite 2-3 years of accumulating! Believe it or not, we are now considering the 1.5¢ mothers to increase our stakes -- that is, I was not joking about your "disposable income"!
As for The Arch next to TREC and opposite to TRX, RM96.97M from the set-aside RM112.44M fund had been spent. That is, the 5-storey building was done as of June 2024 -- RM15.47M renovations and working capital would be spent within three months thereafter.
There are 32 curated lots in the building, and not all will be used for Focus's F&B brands. As Focus owns 75% of the building, it will earn a substantial rental income (aside from its F&B business) since the building is opposite to popular TRX, which will have high-income bankers (e.g., HSBC) and digital workers (e.g., Ants International)! https://thearchkl.com/retail/
The 1.5¢ mothers mentioned previously are no more, so my friend and I were buying the 0.5¢ PA recently. But, no more zombies are willing to throw their PA. Hello zombies, could you ask your bosses, the big sharks, to throw their PA shares for our 3,000,000 PA (0.5¢) quques now?
My friend and I have gathered most of the available 0.5¢ PA from the past two years. Now, you can see how long it would take to collect the cheapest PA -- patience is a virtue!