Jeff Kuan's comment on RANHILL. All Comments
Jeff Kuan
3 Like · Reply
Ini kalilah monday hoseh lol
Report
2 years · translate ·
Mark Siow
hoseh wat lah! profit come from other income especially the "Non-revenue water
reduction incentive
received", not from real business operating.....
1 Like · 2 years · translate
Jeff Kuan
Who care? Lol
Like · 2 years · translate
Mark Siow
u think investor all dun c details in report jz silly goreng meh? if like that axiata should goreng kuat kuat liao lah!
2 Like · 2 years · translate
OMG Wilson
100m++ operating n admin fees per quarter, not easy. Luckily got incentives from non-revenue water. That make Ranhill catch a breath.
Energy section also making losses… need to observe a few more quarters
Like · 2 years · translate
Piqler Studio
i think the incentive should be considered as one of their income, if not include the incentive promise, will ranhill take the job ?
Like · 2 years · translate
Aaa B
It can be said that this is not a surge in the company's basic business income, but it definitely reflects the surge in the company's own professional income.
Like · 2 years · translate
David Tan
if not non revenue other income 142mil already loss 70+mil still not wake up? Non revenue water every time also get??? Government is yours is it?
Like · 2 years · translate
Aaa B
Not obliged to discuss with you
Like · 2 years · translate
OMG Wilson
As a investor either long term or short term… we discuss this issue only. Not to argue who’s right or wrong. Exchange opinions, learn from mistakes, be wise be smart
2 Like · 2 years · translate
Bryan Gan
one time incentive also good. at least cover the RWS 7.5M loss. the money can use for solar development also to save the long term energy operation cost.
Like · 2 years · translate